ScenariosHR Investigation Meeting

Attending an HR Investigation Meeting

How to participate effectively while protecting your rights.

Content last verified against official statutes: March 30, 2026

Context and Setup

You filed a harassment complaint two weeks ago. HR has scheduled an investigation meeting with you. An external investigator will be conducting the interview. You are told it will take about one hour. You have your documentation prepared but are unsure how much to share and how to present your case.

The Conversation

Investigator

Thank you for coming in. I have been retained to investigate your complaint. Everything discussed today will be kept confidential to the extent possible. Can you walk me through what happened?

You

Before I begin, I have a few questions. Can you confirm your qualifications and experience with workplace harassment investigations? Can you confirm who retained you and that you have no prior relationship with [Manager Name] or the management team?

You have the right to know who is investigating and whether they have a conflict of interest. A competent investigator will answer these questions without hesitation.

Investigator

I am [credentials]. I was retained by the employer through [firm name]. I have no prior relationship with anyone involved.

You

Thank you. I have prepared a detailed written statement with a chronological timeline of incidents, supporting evidence, and witness names. I would like to submit this to you and then walk you through it.

A written statement ensures nothing is missed and prevents the investigator from summarizing your words inaccurately. It also becomes part of the record.

Investigator

That is very helpful. Please go ahead.

You (walking through the timeline)

On [Date 1], [factual description of incident]. [Witness Name] was present. I documented this in my personal log that same evening. On [Date 2], [next incident]... (Continue through your timeline.)

Stick to facts. Dates, events, witnesses, evidence. Do not speculate about motives. Let the facts and the pattern speak.

Investigator

How did these incidents affect you?

You

The repeated conduct has caused [specific impacts: difficulty sleeping, anxiety before work, loss of confidence in meetings, seeking counseling]. I have [any medical documentation if applicable]. The pattern has made it difficult to perform my work effectively.

The impact matters for establishing harm. Be honest and specific without exaggerating.

Investigator

Is there anything else you would like to add?

You

I would like to know the expected timeline for the investigation, when I will receive the findings, and what the process is if I disagree with the outcome. I also want to reiterate that I expect confidentiality and protection from reprisal during and after this process.

Always close by establishing expectations and restating your reprisal protection.

What to Document After

  • Date, time, and duration of the interview.
  • Investigator's name, credentials, and firm.
  • Questions asked and your responses (write this immediately after).
  • Any commitments made regarding timeline or process.
  • Follow-up email to HR (not the investigator): "I attended the investigation meeting on [Date] with [Investigator Name]. I submitted my written statement and timeline. [Investigator] indicated the expected timeline is [X]. Please confirm receipt and let me know if any additional information is needed."

Escalation Options

If the investigation takes unreasonably long (beyond 90 days with no update), file a Labour Program complaint for failure to comply with SOR/2020-130.
If the investigation is deficient (key witnesses not interviewed, evidence ignored, biased conclusions), the report itself becomes evidence in your external complaints.
If adverse action occurs during the investigation, file a CIRB reprisal complaint immediately.
90-day deadline
You retain the right to file with CIRB, CHRC, and OPC regardless of the investigation outcome.

Key Statutes

SOR/2020-130Investigation requirements — competent and impartial investigator
CLC s.246.1Reprisal protection during and after the investigation process
CHRA s.7Discrimination protections if harassment is on a prohibited ground

When Should You Contact a Lawyer?

This platform is designed to help you build your case independently — collecting evidence, documenting incidents, writing complaints in compliance language, and navigating the internal HR process. Many employees can handle these steps without a lawyer.

The most effective time to engage a lawyer is after you have completed the internal process and your employer has failed to resolve your complaint. At that point, a lawyer can review your complete file — your timeline, evidence, complaint, and the employer's response — and provide strategic advice before you file with an external body such as the CIRB, CHRC, or OPC.

By doing the groundwork yourself, your consultation becomes a focused strategic review rather than a costly fact-gathering session. This approach has been validated by employment lawyers who reviewed files prepared using this methodology and found the documentation thorough with nothing to add.

Did this help you?

MyWorkRights.ca is free for every Canadian worker. If this information helped you, consider supporting the project. Every dollar goes toward keeping this site updated and reaching more employees who need it.

Powered by Stripe

Cite This Page

MyWorkRights.ca, "Attending an HR Investigation Meeting," accessed 2026-04-01, https://myworkrights.ca/scenarios/hr-investigation-meeting

Written by the MyWorkRights.ca team, based on direct experience navigating the CIRB, OPC, and CHRC complaint processes and 500+ hours of employment law research.